Imagine if Thanos Won Again Reddit

This post discusses Avengers: Endgame in depth, and spoilers abound. If y'all haven't seen the motion picture and don't want to be spoiled, this is your run a risk to leave.

By now, if you're a Curiosity fan, or even just Marvel-curious, you lot've seen the big conclusion to the studio's starting time eleven years of films. Avengers: Endgame goes out of its style to shake up the Marvel status quo, and even if the Curiosity Cinematic Universe is a comic book franchise where changes never stick for long, Endgame's overall effect is yet exhilarating.

But the movie may have left you with some big unresolved questions. If you still don't quite understand Endgame'southward use of time travel, or if you want to know who that kid was in the movie's saddest scene, or if you're simply wondering what Marvel'southward plans are for the futurity, you lot've come up to the right place.

Here'southward our take on nine questions you might still accept about Avengers: Endgame after watching it. And if yous haven't seen the picture yet, needless to say, SPOILERS FOLLOW!

1) What really happened in the ending of Endgame, and that terminal scene in particular? A.m.a., explain this time travel stuff to me. Please.

First let'south hit the broadest bullet points of the ending:

• The ending takes identify in 2023. The "v years later" fourth dimension jump is another five years after 2018, when the majority of the film is set up, and the film explicitly says that 2014 was "nine years agone." The Avengers, having traveled through time to collect all 6 Infinity Stones from before Thanos destroyed them, fabricated a special glove containing all six stones and put information technology on Hulk. He snapped his fingers, thus restoring everybody Thanos had dusted in Infinity State of war dorsum to life at the present moment — not 5 years in the past, when the dusting actually happened.
• A Thanos from 2014 traveled forward to 2023, with the aid of 2014 Nebula (who took the place of 2023 Nebula), and so blew upward Avengers HQ.
• At that place is a huge fight scene that encompasses much of the movie's last 45 minutes, which includes every Avenger introduced so far, a bunch of side characters, and fifty-fifty Pepper Potts in full Iron Human being regalia. Information technology'due south actually cool and fan service-y; we get to come across Helm America wield Thor's hammer and all kinds of fun things.
• That fight scene includes a massive game of go on-away involving the glove containing the Infinity Stones, which is held (only not worn) by nearly every character of note. Thanos finally gets hold of it but is prevented by Captain Marvel from snapping his fingers to completely unmake all of existence.
• Tony Stark tricks Thanos by taking not the new Infinity Gauntlet, merely the Infinity Stones themselves, which slide into slots on his armor. He snaps his fingers and erases Thanos and his army — but Tony dies in the process.

There are several more large moments afterward that — seriously, the biggest complaint about this movie might stop up being how long information technology takes to wrap up its business concern — and we eventually learn that Captain America has finer left the franchise (by heading into the past to live a long, happy life with his honey Peggy Carter). It's a large, warm, happy bow on the entire story.

OR IS IT?

Okay, yeah, it is, but if you recall almost Endgame's use of time travel for a couple of seconds, the ending starts to sour just a piddling bit. Endgame uses a theory of time travel that's pretty different from that of almost other movies, which posit that changing the past likewise changes the time to come. Endgame says that if you change the past, y'all create a new parallel universe that branches off from the moment you lot inverse said past — but when y'all travel into the future, yous return to your original futurity, non the new one created by the changes you made in the by.

This is ... complicated. (Nearly time travel theorists suggest that if you changed the past, yous would exist doomed to also hang out in the new parallel reality you created.) Only information technology's also necessary that the Avengers eventually get their easily on all 6 Infinity Stones and don't mess with reality so much that they erase Tony and Pepper'southward daughter, Morgan — who was built-in after the events of Infinity War — from existence.

This also ways that Endgame glosses over what amounts to 2 apocalypses. The first is Thanos's Infinity War dusting, which Endgame mostly suggests has amounted to piled-up garbage and the dissolution of the New York Mets. But it does dig into some of the personal traumas Thanos caused, like when director Joe Russo cameos as a man Steve Rogers meets in a support grouping, who's simply getting back into the dating scene after his onetime partner was dusted.

The second apocalypse is when everybody comes back five years later. Yes, the dude Steve meets at the support group, who hasn't quite moved on, is going to be thrilled to have his guy dorsum. But plenty of people will take remarried or entered into new serious relationships. They'll take coped with the grief over losing a child or a parent. And suddenly ... there will exist somebody back in their lives, someone they literally thought had ceased to exist.

It seems unlikely the Marvel movies will deal with this, but boy, at present don't you kind of want them to? Maybe the visitor could do a sort of reverse-Leftovers TV show for the new Disney+ streaming service.

2) Is Tony Stark'due south decease going to stick?

Most likely. During the press tour for Infinity War in 2018, Chris Evans had said that he, Robert Downey Jr., and Chris Hemsworth were more or less done afterward Endgame. "Myself, Downey, Hemsworth, nosotros all kind of started roughly at the aforementioned time, and I recall we all, through [Endgame], kind of wrap it upwardly," Evans told Proficient Morning time America.

Tony Stark's expiry, so, isn't only a way to conclude his story — it's also a plumbing equipment go out for Downey, at least contractually. But there'southward something in Marvel's comic books that could maybe be a way for him to come back should he want to. At the end of the Marvel comic volume result known as Civil State of war 2 , Stark is desperately hurt, just and then nosotros find out he created an AI of himself — with his consciousness and his vast knowledge and intelligence — in instance his body stopped working:

Tony Stark's AI.

Marvel

The AI, which mentored and helped out the Avengers, appeared to be a sort of holographic figure — not dissimilar the hologram message that Tony left for his daughter at the end of Endgame. If Marvel and Downey were game (or Downey was at least willing to let Marvel utilize his likeness for Stark), Curiosity Studios could copy the comics and continue an AI version of Stark as a recurring character.

3) Who was that kid at Tony Stark'southward funeral?

The shot of a teenager heart-searching toward the back of Tony's funeral gathering — he's standing by Maria Loma, and you lot see him for a couple of seconds before the camera pans over to Carol Danvers — feels similar it might be a setup for some new teen superhero to join the MCU, or maybe a surprise reveal about Tony's hugger-mugger son.

But no, this is just Ty Simpkins, the player who played Harley in Iron Man 3, a.k.a. the little kid Tony bonds with in that movie, which is unquestionably the best of the Fe Man movies, and if anybody who works for Vox tries to tell y'all otherwise, they are a Skrull — and not 1 of the misunderstood ones from the Captain Marvel movie; i of the evil ones from the Clandestine Wars comics crossover event.

This is a very weird callback — Harley hasn't been in any movies since Iron Man 3 — but it's also a sweet acknowledgment that Tony's impact extends across the firsthand Avengers family. We'll allow it.

4) What happened to Gamora?

Unclear, but here'due south a thought: At the end of Endgame, Tony snaps his own glove bearing the Infinity Stones to decimate Thanos and his forces (and, sadly, himself). And nosotros know that Peter Quill, a.k.a. Star-Lord, is using his computer to track downwards 2014 Gamora (present-day Gamora was sacrificed to become the Soul Stone in Infinity War), who is labeled as missing. And the last clue we take is that future 2023 Nebula (2014 Nebula was killed) and 2014 Gamora were together at some point, but only Nebula returned to the Guardians.

There's a slight possibility that Gamora was killed during Fe Homo's snap. We don't know who he used his snap against other than Thanos, his allies, and his soldiers. Gamora could accept been considered an ally and soldier because she hadn't officially left Thanos for the Guardians at that signal. It's not equally though Iron Man has any clue who she is — he but knows her equally the woman that Star-Lord freaked out nearly in Infinity War before Star-Lord bungled their unabridged plan by being a selfish brat. Iron Man would have needed to wish for something like "all Thanos's forces except for Gamora" in society for her to live.

But killing a major grapheme offscreen isn't really Curiosity's way (though it did exercise that with Shuri). The more likely scenario is that finding 2014 Gamora will be part of the tertiary Guardians of the Galaxy film, which is in development after the rehiring of director James Gunn. When Gamora died in Infinity State of war, it left her Guardians status in dubiousness, just in 2018, Saldana signed a letter along with the balance of the Guardians cast and crew to reinstate Gunn as the director of Vol. three, signaling that she will still appear in some chapters.

5) So what exactly happened with Steve Rogers?

At the end of Endgame, Steve Rogers is tasked with returning each of the Infinity Stones to their respective timelines. The Ancient One, who bestows the Hulk with the Time Stone in 2012, explains that putting back the Stones is necessary to go along the 2012 timeline from branching off into an alternate time to come, a world that would be vulnerable without the protection of the Infinity Stones.

Rogers goes back and returns all the stones, a trip that should only take seconds. But the squad spearheading the trek — Hulk, Sam Wilson a.k.a. Falcon, and Bucky Barnes — has trouble calling him back. After a couple of attempts, Bucky points out that there'due south an old man sitting on a demote nearby, and he turns out to be Steve Rogers (Chris Evans as you've never seen him before: in old human makeup!). Rogers informs his closest confidant Sam that he decided to take a life, which Tony Stark always poked at him well-nigh, insinuating that he went back in time and lived his life with Peggy Carter instead of coming back to the present. And since he lived a full life, he'southward at present a very, very old Steve Rogers.

But this opens up more questions, similar: What happened to the Steve Rogers who exists in the past timeline? Did the time-traveling Rogers only decide to live in secret, hiding from the parallel Helm America? Did he then sit down idly by and spotter all the things he'd already witnessed play out a second time, like Hydra taking over S.H.I.Eastward.L.D. or the invasion of New York? Did he spawn a new timeline? If so, how did he get dorsum to his original timeline? Besides, did Steve Rogers just give back the Soul Stone to Ruby Skull, and does that hateful Black Widow is coming dorsum?

The specifics are unclear, but it seems as though Rogers went dorsum, lived a seemingly normal life with Peggy Carter, aged into an old man (super soldier serum be damned), and seemingly met Sam, Bucky, and the Hulk at the place they were sending him back in fourth dimension. But the bespeak here is that Rogers got his happy ending, a adventure to go dorsum to the world he missed so much, even if it meant ignoring some of the time-travel logistics.

6) Does onetime Captain America break reality?

But wait a second: How does the above explanation square with everything else in this movie and the broader MCU? Nosotros've established that the second you lot change the past in this movie, a new parallel universe splits off. Then when Steve Rogers returns to the past to live out a life with Peggy Carter, doesn't he effectively enter a new universe entirely?

The answer to that would seem to be yes, merely that leads one to wonder just how he made information technology to the park demote where he has his conversation with his good pal Sam. An obvious rebuttal is that he returned to that point in time using the breakthrough realm time-travel device equally an old man to testify everybody his life had been a happy i, but then he would take popped dorsum into the middle of the time machine. There's no way he could have snuck past everybody to the park bench.

The trickier possibility — and the 1 that makes more sense — is that when Cap returns to the past and decides to stay, he accidentally reveals that the MCU reality has always had two Steves, who somehow exist simultaneously and never bump into each other. Then, when he'southward caught upwards with the current moment in linear time, he shows up on that park bench, where Sam and Bucky notice him. Or, put another way, for Steve to stay in our reality without causing a parallel universe split, he has to accept e'er been here twice without anybody finding out.

Making sense of this story point requires that Peggy doesn't reveal to Steve that she'southward really been married to his other cocky all this time when Steve goes to visit her in the hospital in Winter Soldier, and it requires a whole bunch of other mental convolutions to sort out its weird complexities. (Just think about how Steve reacts when he meets his new baby niece Sharon!) But you can sort of make sense of it. If you really try.

In conclusion: Time travel is dizzy, and you should never recall about information technology.

vii) So is that i timeline where Loki gets ahold of the Tesseract completely screwed at present?

Yeah, probably. You lot should as well endeavour non to think about this.

8) And so, ummm, how does Spider-Man: Far From Home work now?

Await: The Curiosity movies are not without continuity errors. The studio's MO, very quietly, is that if something is good for a standalone film just contradicts something in a different picture show, it will simply cover the contradiction. It'due south one of the reasons Marvel movies are pretty good across the board and, thus, add up to a cinematic universe that feels similar it's more coherent than information technology actually is.

But even by these standards, the fact that the events of Endgame mean that the MCU technically now takes place in the year 2023 creates a bunch of logistical headaches for Spider-Man: Far From Domicile, which comes out in July and is not quite an MCU film (every bit it'southward produced by Sony and not Marvel Studios), simply besides not not an MCU film (as Spider-Man and his friend Ned pop upward in Infinity War and Endgame).

See, Far From Domicile centers on a trip Peter Parker and his classmates take to Europe, which implies they're all still in loftier school. But if literally any of Peter's friends fell into the l per centum of people who weren't dusted by Thanos, then they would be five years older than their peers and, as such, in college or even working at their first job. The merely way the plot of Far From Dwelling house works is if everybody Peter Parker knows was Thanosed.

And look, sure, if that's how Far From Dwelling wants to play it, we'll get with it. Simply my goodness, the probability of Peter, Ned, MJ, Betty, Wink, and Liz all getting dusted is 1.half-dozen percent. (Thank you to Vox'south Alvin Chang for this calculation.) Obviously, it's possible, simply it'southward going to rankle simply a flake. (Or Far From Habitation will just ignore the whole "it'due south technically 2023" matter and practise whatever it wants, which is what I would do.)

Though imagine if MJ had survived, and her would-exist romance with Peter was complicated even further by her now being v years older than him! That could accept been fun!

9) What are the next Marvel movies coming out?

Marvel has announced a few movies in the works, including a Black Widow solo movie (which is going to exist tricky, what with her death and all, but rumor has information technology the movie is a prequel), a Blackness Panther sequel, a third Guardians of the Galaxy movie, a picture about the beings known as Eternals, a Doctor Strange follow-upwards, and a movie nearly Shang-Chi, Marvel's offset movie about an Asian superhero. There will also certainly be a Captain Curiosity sequel, considering the movie has at present passed the $1 billion marking.

But Marvel hasn't revealed when these movies are going to exist released, probably in an effort to keep the attention on Endgame and not spoil information technology (e.g., if Curiosity released the specifics of a Black Widow flick, fans might be able to define what happened to Black Widow in Endgame before even seeing the moving-picture show). We will probably see release dates for 2020 soon after Endgame hits theaters, or at Disney's D23 expo in Baronial.

smithabling.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.vox.com/2019/4/26/18514287/avengers-endgame-ending-explained-spoiler

Share this post