How Many Babies Are Born Preterm or With a Low Birth Weight in the Us

Abstract

Pregnancy outcomes in the The states and other developed countries are considerably better than those in many developing countries. Nevertheless, adverse pregnancy outcomes are mostly more common in the United states than in other developed countries. Low-birth-weight infants, born afterward a preterm nativity or secondary to intrauterine growth restriction, account for much of the increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. Wide disparities exist in both preterm nativity and growth restriction amid unlike population groups. Poor and black women, for instance, have twice the preterm nativity rate and higher rates of growth restriction than do most other women. Low nascence weight in general is thought to place the babe at greater chance of later adult chronic medical conditions, such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart illness. Of interest, maternal thinness is a strong predictor of both preterm birth and fetal growth restriction. However, in the U.s.a., several nutritional interventions, including loftier-protein diets, caloric supplementation, calcium and iron supplementation, and various other vitamin and mineral supplementations, have non generally reduced preterm nativity or growth restriction. Bacterial intrauterine infections play an important function in the etiology of the earliest preterm births, just, at least to date, antibiotic treatment either earlier labor for risk factors such as bacterial vaginosis or during preterm labor have not consistently reduced the preterm nascency rate. Almost interventions take failed to reduce preterm birth or growth restriction. The substantial improvement in newborn survival in the The states over the by several decades is by and large due to improve admission to improved neonatal intendance for low-birth-weight infants.

INTRODUCTION

Pregnancy outcomes in the U.s. and other adult countries are considerably meliorate than those seen in many developing countries (1, two). Stillbirth rates are in the range of 3–7 per 1000 births versus ≥30 in many developing countries. Neonatal mortality rates are ≈4–six per 1000 newborns versus ≥40 per 1000 newborns in developing countries, and maternal mortality rates are in the range of 5–10 per 100 000 pregnancies versus rates every bit high equally 500–thousand per 100 000 pregnancies in some developing countries. Nevertheless, despite these better outcomes in developed countries, agin pregnancy outcomes are generally more common in the The states than in other developed countries and result in both excessive medical costs in the perinatal menstruum and increased long-term neurologic disability (3, four). In both developed and developing countries, low nascency weight (LBW) is an important cause of perinatal mortality and both curt- and long-term infant and babyhood morbidity. LBW infants dice at rates of up to 40 times those of infants of normal weight, and LBW infants are many times more likely to terminate upwardly with long-term handicapping conditions ( Figure i). This article will explore bug related to the causes, outcomes, and interventions used to prevent LBW.

FIGURE 1.

Sequelae of preterm birth.

DEFINITIONS OF Depression BIRTH WEIGHT

LBW is not a homogeneous pregnancy issue, only instead, conceptually, is composed of infants who are either built-in also early, ie, preterm nascence, or besides small, ie, with fetal growth brake. According to the World Health Organization, a LBW infant is one born weighing <2500 chiliad (5). Preterm infants are those born at <37 wk from the first twenty-four hour period of the final menstrual menses, regardless of birth weight, whereas growth-restricted infants are those born weighing less than the 10th percentile of birth weight–for–gestational historic period, regardless of whether that weight is <2500 g Thus, information technology is possible for both preterm and growth-restricted infants to weigh >2500 g.

To define growth brake, one needs a set of birth weight–for–gestational age standards with the 10th percentile birth weights defined (6). Many such standards have been published, and the 10th percentile birth weights vary substantially among them. There are many issues related to the choice of which set of standards to use (6). Although these will not exist reviewed in detail here, it is clear that if one bases the standard on nascency populations such as those found in Scandinavia, the tenth percentile cutoff for fetal growth brake will be essentially higher than if the standard is based on a predominantly black birth population in the Usa or a population of births from the Indian subcontinent. Within the United states, whether the nascence population used to create the standard is a population at sea level or a population living at high elevations such as Denver, CO, also makes a deviation. In any case, the reasons to choose one nascence population to apply as a standard versus another have been discussed in detail, and suffice it to say which standard to use is still a controversial topic.

NEONATAL OUTCOMES ASSOCIATED WITH Low BIRTH WEIGHT

The important nativity outcomes related to LBW include both fetal and neonatal expiry, postneonatal death, short-term morbidities such equally respiratory distress syndrome and necrotizing enterocolitis, and long-term morbidities such every bit blindness, deafness, hydrocephaly, mental retardation, and cerebral palsy. However, whether an infant is preterm or growth restricted, if it has no short-term morbidity, is discharged from the hospital at the usual time, and suffers no long-term morbidity or mortality, information technology matters petty whether the infant was built-in growth restricted or preterm. Thus, many investigators utilise preterm birth and growth restriction as a surrogate or intermediate outcome measure out for serious morbidity or mortality. Said differently, the goals of reducing growth retardation or preterm birth are of import only every bit they reflect reductions in morbidity and mortality. Information technology is possible, and even probable, that in some circumstances, if handicap or death is avoided, delivering an infant early is non the worst of all possible outcomes.

STILLBIRTH AND Low BIRTH WEIGHT

The relation betwixt stillbirth and LBW is often not considered (seven). Nevertheless, it is of import to sympathize that in the United States, approximately half of all stillbirths occur at <28 wk gestational historic period, and another one-third occur between 28 and 36 wk (eight). Thus, somewhere betwixt 2-thirds and three-quarters of all stillbirths are preterm and mostly LBW. Both fetal growth restriction and preterm birth are important run a risk factors for stillbirth.

PRETERM Nascence

The incidence of preterm nascency in the United States is traditionally stated to exist about 10%. In fact, over the by 25 y, the preterm birth rate in the United States and in most other adult countries has risen (9, 10). In the United States, this increment has been from virtually 9.5% to 12.5% ( Effigy 2). Although nearly other developed countries have essentially lower preterm birth rates than does the United States, many have experienced similar rises in the preterm birth rate over the by several decades.

FIGURE two.

Incidence of preterm birth in the U.s., 1981–2002. Source: National Vital Statistics Report (10).

Preterm nascence is generally thought of as having iii obstetric precursors ( Figure three). The beginning is an indicated preterm nascence, usually for maternal or fetal indications. These births occur because the physician believes the fetus would do better in the nursery than in the uterus. Labor is either induced or the fetus is delivered by elective cesarean delivery. Common reasons for these decisions include fetal distress, which is usually determined by electronic fetal monitoring; severe growth restriction, which is usually determined by fetal ultrasound; maternal preeclampsia; and placental abruption. In most studies, near 25% of all preterm births occur for maternal or fetal indications. The rest of the preterm births are classified every bit spontaneous. These follow premature rupture of the membranes or spontaneous preterm labor, regardless of whether the delivery ultimately is vaginal or by cesarean delivery. In about studies, about l% of all preterm births follow spontaneous preterm labor and about 30% follow premature rupture of the membranes.

Effigy 3.

Etiology of preterm nativity.

Ananth et al (xi) attempted to define the reasons for the increase in preterm births over the by decade and a half. In an analysis using U.s.a. vital statistics data, they concluded that a large role of the increase in preterm births in singletons is explained by an increase in indicated preterm births ( Figure four). Other authors have emphasized the considerable increase in preterm births associated with multiple births that occur after the apply of various assisted reproductive techniques (12). At to the lowest degree one report in Canada suggested that a portion of the increment in spontaneous preterm births was associated with an increase in chorioamnionitis (13). In any case, putting together all available data, information technology appears as if indicated preterm births and multiple births secondary to assisted reproductive technologies account for the vast majority of the increment in preterm births noted above.

Effigy four.

Temporal changes in all preterm births and those resulting from ruptured membranes, medically indicated reasons, and spontaneous preterm birth, United States, 1989–2000. Source: adapted from Ananth et al (11).

RACE, ETHNICITY, AND Depression Birth WEIGHT

For unknown reasons, belonging to various racial and indigenous groups is very strongly associated with both preterm birth and growth restriction. For example, in the United States, blackness women are approximately twice as likely to take a preterm birth and are 3 to 4 times as probable to accept a very early preterm nascency as women are from most other racial or ethnic groups (14). East Asian women typically have low rates of preterm nativity, as exercise Hispanic women. Women from Southern asia and particularly the Indian subcontinent accept very high rates of fetal growth brake and depression birth weight. Amongst all the various groups living in the The states, the very high preterm nascency charge per unit in black women stands out and to this engagement remains mostly unexplained.

Low-BIRTH-WEIGHT OUTCOMES

One of the very large success stories in the United States and other developed countries is the improved survival in very LBW infants over the past 3 decades. For instance, if one focuses on infants born weighing betwixt 500 and one thousand one thousand, in 1975, survival for those infants was ≈xv%. At the nowadays time, survival for the same group of infants approaches lxxx%. Comeback in survival over the past decades for infants between built-in weighing between thousand and 2500 thousand is equally impressive. With these improvements, mortality in infants built-in weighing 1000 to 2500 thou is quite rare, and when 1 examines the distribution of neonatal mortality by birth weight group, ≈sixty% of all neonatal bloodshed is constitute in infants weighing <g thou. Thus, if nosotros are to accept a really large effect on neonatal mortality in the United States, our major goal must be to reduce mortality in infants built-in weighing <1000 g.

In that location are several long-term outcomes associated with both preterm nascency and fetal growth restriction. Among the best studied are neurologic outcomes such as cerebral palsy, blindness, deafness, and hydrocephaly. The earlier the gestational age and the lower the nascence weight, the greater the adventure of all complications and specially cognitive palsy (fifteen). For example, as shown in Figure 5, that in infants born weighing >2500 thousand at term, the risk of cerebral palsy is i to 2 per one thousand births. On the other mitt, for infants born at the edge of survival (at most 23–24 wk and at 500–600 g), the prevalence of cerebral palsy is equally high as 250 per thou births. In 1998, Lorenz et al (sixteen) performed a meta-analysis of studies that presented survival and the prevalence of disability in extremely LBW infants. As shown in Effigy 6A, from 1975 to 1995, survival among these extremely small infants increased substantially. On the other hand, the prevalence of disability among the extremely small survivors remained almost unchanged over time, averaging virtually 25% (Figure 6B). Thus, considering the survivors increased and the prevalence of disability among the survivors stayed the same, the absolute number of survivors with disability increased (Figure 6C). In an attempt to show how this might play out for all births in the U.s.a., we constructed Table 1. It can exist seen that from 1960 to 2000, ≈twenty 000 infants were born each yr weighing <thousand g. Yet, survival increased from ≈1% in 1960 to ≈80% in 2000. The number of survivors has increased accordingly. Since the percent of survivors with cerebral palsy or with whatever inability has remained approximately the same, 1 can see that among the 20 000 infants born each year weighing <thousand g, the number of survivors with cerebral palsy and the number of survivors with other disabilities has increased substantially over the years. Thus, the major success related to preterm birth is a reduction in mortality. At that place obviously has been no reduction in preterm nascence, and in that location appears to be niggling or no reduction in long-term handicap, at least amidst the smallest survivors.

FIGURE v.

Approximate prevalence of cerebral palsy per m births past birth weight and gestational age.

Figure half dozen.

Changes in pregnancy outcomes over time in extremely small infants. (The size of the circumvolve represents the size of the cohort.) Source: adapted from Lorenz et al (16). (A) Survival rate for extremely small infants (<800 m) in relation to year of nascency. (B) Prevalence of disability among extremely minor survivors (<800 g) in relation to year of nascency. (C) Pct of extremely small (<800 yard) alive births surviving with at least one inability in relation to year of birth.

TABLE ane

Cognitive palsy (CP) in infants weighing <1000 g at birth

Year	Births <1000 g	Survival	Survivors	Survivors with CP ¹	Survivors with whatever disability ²
	n	%	n	northward	n
1960	20 000	i	200	16	32
1985	20 000	xl	8000	640	1280
2000	20 000	80	sixteen 000	1280	2560

Twelvemonth	Births <k one thousand	Survival	Survivors	Survivors with CP ¹	Survivors with any disability ²
	due north	%	n	n	n
1960	xx 000	one	200	16	32
1985	20 000	twoscore	8000	640	1280
2000	twenty 000	80	16 000	1280	2560

ane

Assuming an 8% incidence in survivors consistently over time.

Assuming a 16% incidence in survivors consistently over time.

TABLE 1

Cerebral palsy (CP) in infants weighing <chiliad m at birth

Twelvemonth	Births <m g	Survival	Survivors	Survivors with CP ^one	Survivors with whatever disability ²
	n	%	n	n	n
1960	20 000	ane	200	xvi	32
1985	20 000	40	8000	640	1280
2000	20 000	80	16 000	1280	2560

Twelvemonth	Births <1000 g	Survival	Survivors	Survivors with CP ^one	Survivors with any inability ^two
	due north	%	n	north	n
1960	20 000	1	200	16	32
1985	20 000	forty	8000	640	1280
2000	20 000	fourscore	xvi 000	1280	2560

Bold an 8% incidence in survivors consistently over time.

Assuming a 16% incidence in survivors consistently over fourth dimension.

In relation to growth restriction, it appears that long-term disability is related to the caste of growth brake (17). Those infants built-in betwixt the 5th and 10th percentiles, for example, have little increment in long-term neurologic damage. On the other paw, infants born below the 3rd and especially below the 1st percentile are at considerably greater gamble. The prevalence of long-term handicap also depends on the gestational age at which the growth restriction became established. For instance, when growth restriction is documented before 26 wk, the infants are considerably more likely to accept cerebral palsy or other neurologic damage than are infants who grew accordingly the past 26 wk and then ceased growing normally. In whatever example, the risks of cerebral palsy associated with growth restriction (<1%), especially if the infant is born close to term, are considerably less than for preterm infants born weighing 500–thou g, for which overall take chances is ≈eight%.

CHRONIC DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH LOW Birth WEIGHT

In recent years, at that place has been a great bargain of interest in the relation of LBW and each of its components to the development of long-term chronic medical atmospheric condition, such as hypertension, diabetes, and middle affliction. Termed the Barker Hypothesis, this relation has been studied extensively, and although its existence is controversial, it is supported by the results of several epidemiologic studies (eighteen). Still, no interventions have been shown to reduce the long-term chronic diseases potentially associated with LBW.

PREDICTING PRETERM Nascency

In the United States, many studies have focused on the prediction of preterm birth in the hope that being able to predict preterm birth would atomic number 82 to its prevention (19). Conceptually, the predictors for preterm birth might be divided into one) demographic characteristics such equally race and poverty, 2) adverse health behaviors such as smoking, 3) maternal physical characteristics such equally body size and especially depression trunk mass index (BMI; in kg/mⁱⁱ), iv) medical obstetric history such as having a prior preterm birth, v) biophysical characteristics such as the length of the cervix as determined either by physical examination or ultrasound, and six) a big number of biological fluid markers. Amid the strongest predictors of preterm birth are black race, maternal thinness as measured past a depression BMI (<20), a history of a prior preterm birth and especially an early on preterm birth, a brusque cervical length as measured by ultrasound, and a positive exam event for cervical or vaginal fluid fetal fibronectin (20, 21). Unfortunately, noesis of the presence of any of these characteristics has non been helpful in reducing the incidence of preterm birth.

INFECTION AND PRETERM Nascency

Over the by 20 y, information technology has become apparent that many of the early spontaneous preterm births are associated with and probably acquired past intrauterine bacterial infections (22–24). The organisms are usually vaginal in origin and ascend into the uterus either before or early in pregnancy. The organisms are ofttimes of low virulence and the infections tend to exist chronic, persisting for weeks or months before the preterm labor or membrane rupture initiates a spontaneous preterm birth. Ureaplasma urealyticum and mycoplasma hominis are the 2 near common organisms, only >30 different bacteria have been identified. Many of these organisms are components of a chronic vaginal infection chosen bacterial vaginosis, a common condition associated with a 2-fold increase in preterm birth. Near 85% of spontaneous preterm births of fetuses weighing <k g are idea to be caused by an intrauterine infection, merely few of the later preterm births are associated with this status. Many attempts have been fabricated to reduce preterm birth past using antibiotics, either in the prenatal menstruation or during early on labor. Although the results of a few studies have been positive, most have failed to show a reduction in preterm nascency, and no authoritative US agency recommends the utilize of antibiotics to achieve a reduction in preterm birth (24).

NUTRITIONAL ISSUES

Because this is a conference devoted to nutritional issues, information technology is appropriate to briefly explore the relation between maternal body habitus and LBW. In recent years, information technology has get clear from many studies that thin women accept a higher risk of having both preterm and growth-restricted infants than do average-sized women (25, 26). In fact, the relation seems to be essentially linear in that the thinner the woman, the greater the adventure of both preterm birth and fetal growth restriction. Conversely, the heavier the adult female, the lower the risk. Still, the heavier the adult female, the greater the hazard of a wide diversity of pregnancy-related complications such as chronic hypertension, preeclampsia and eclampsia, and diabetes. In Figure 7, which is derived from information from the National Institute of Child Wellness and Human Development Preterm Prediction Study, information technology can be seen that equally maternal BMI increases, the rate of spontaneous preterm birth decreases (26). Some evidence suggests that the relation between BMI and preterm birth is mediated through cervical length, in that women who are overweight and obese tend to have longer cervices, which seem to protect against spontaneous preterm birth (19).

Figure vii.

Spontaneous and indicated preterm birth (PTB) by maternal trunk mass index. Source: adapted from Hendler et al (26).

Several interesting observations have related various risk factors to growth restriction mediated by maternal BMI. For case, higher BMIs announced to protect the fetus against the effect of smoking on growth restriction (27). Similarly, higher BMIs protect the fetus from the effect of maternal stress on growth restriction (28). In a randomized clinical trial, low doses of aspirin increased birth weight and newborn intestinal circumference, but this relation occurred only in thinner women (29). Finally, in another randomized clinical trial, zinc supplementation increased nativity weight substantially, but only in thinner women (30). Thus, some bear witness suggests that maternal thinness is a gamble factor for spontaneous preterm birth and fetal growth restriction. Furthermore, at least ii treatments that might reduce fetal growth restriction and preterm birth seem to work but in women who are thin. High BMIs seem to protect against two run a risk factors for growth restriction, maternal smoking, and maternal stress. Another interesting ascertainment relating maternal BMI to an agin pregnancy outcome is that women with high BMIs are more than likely to have infants with neural tube defects, and folate supplementation seems to work less well in preventing neural tube defects in these women (31). Thus, the relation of maternal trunk habitus, various take chances factors, and diverse interventions to improving outcomes should be explored farther.

NUTRITIONAL INTERVENTIONS

Because maternal thinness has been associated with preterm birth and growth restriction, several studies have been made of nutritional interventions to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes. First, it is clear that folic acrid reduces the prevalence of certain congenital anomalies (32). It is also articulate that in certain developing countries where about-starvation diets are common, nutritional supplementation improves several outcomes, including reducing mortality as well equally decreasing preterm nativity and growth brake (33). Notwithstanding, in the United States, virtually all nutritional interventions used to reduce low birth weight or its components, preterm birth and growth restriction, accept failed (34, 35). In fact, poly peptide supplementation appears to accept a negative consequence on pregnancy outcome. Nutritional counseling programs take had minimal effects, if any, on pregnancy outcomes, and caloric supplementation programs including WIC (the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children) have been associated with but minor increases in nativity weight, but no other of import improvements in outcome. Supplementation during pregnancy with various minerals such as atomic number 26, calcium or zinc, and various vitamin preparations have not consistently reduced preterm nascence or growth restriction.

STRATEGIES USED TO REDUCE Depression BIRTH WEIGHT

Many other strategies have been used in an endeavour to reduce LBW (34). These include a general increase in prenatal care and many of its components. Home uterine contraction monitoring, for example, has not generally led to any decrease in preterm birth and often is associated with an increment in the apply of various interventions that mostly have not been effective (34, 36). Programs aimed at reducing adverse wellness behaviors, such as the utilize of drugs, alcohol, or tobacco, have mostly not had a major effect on reducing preterm birth or growth restriction (34). We should emphasize here, still, that tobacco use is more distinctly associated with growth brake than with preterm birth (37), and it is likely that the recent decline in tobacco apply during pregnancy is associated with an overall increase in birth weight. Many other interventions such equally bed residue, apply of antibiotics to treat infection, home uterine activeness monitoring to search for uterine contractions before labor, and various treatments of preterm labor such equally intravenous hydration, various tocolytic agents, etc, have not been associated with a reduction in preterm nascence (34, 36, 38), Similarly, strategies used to prevent growth restriction and especially growth brake associated with preeclampsia, such as bed residual, calcium supplementation, antihypertensive medications, etc, have more often than not failed as well. Two recent studies suggest that the apply of a progestational agent prenatally might reduce preterm birth in women with a history of prior preterm birth (39, 40). Nonetheless, because simply a small fraction of preterm births derive from this population, the overall effect of this intervention is likely to be pocket-size. Therefore, considering nearly strategies aimed at preventing preterm birth and preeclampsia have not been shown to be constructive when applied to defined populations, it is not surprising that the preterm and low birth weight rates accept not declined.

REGIONALIZATION OF PERINATAL CARE

Because it is obvious that the programs aimed at reducing preterm birth take not been successful, a question oft asked is, "Is annihilation that we do worthwhile? " Clearly, when equivalent gestational ages are considered, survival among preterm infants in the U.s. is as good or better than anywhere else in the world. What is being done well in the United States is the provision of medical care for high-risk women and their newborns. The concept of regionalization of perinatal intendance arose in the 1960s and 1970s with a goal of having the mother and baby cared for past well-trained practitioners with access to all the modern interventions at the most advisable institution. In nearly areas of the United States, systems of transportation have been established and so that mothers likely to deliver a preterm infant are quickly moved to an advisable institution. Regionalization, together with improvements in engineering, peculiarly for high-risk, LBW infants, is responsible for nearly of the improvements in preterm newborn survival described higher up. Advances on the maternal side include the utilize of corticosteroids to mature the fetal lung and other organ systems and fewer traumatic preterm deliveries (41). On the neonatal side, a wide range of improvements in care include the use of surfactant, the use of antibiotics, and a better agreement and use of newborn respirators and oxygen delivery (42).

SUMMARY

In summary, the effect of LBW, and specially its preterm birth component, has proven to exist one of the nigh hard pregnancy-related issues to address. Although survival has improved, the proportion of births born before term continues to increase and the rate of disability among the preterm survivors has not decreased. Continued research aimed at reducing the preterm birth charge per unit and inability among survivors is crucial if we are to achieve substantial improvements in pregnancy result in the United States.

RLG performed the literature review, presented the data at the conference, and wrote the first typhoon of the newspaper. JFC helped to conceptualize the project, reviewed the data before presentation, and edited both the presentation and the newspaper. Neither of the authors had whatever financial interest or conflict of involvement with the report.

REFERENCES

Sciarra

Reproductive health: a global perspective

Am J Obstet Gynecol

1993

;

168

1649

–

Goldenberg

Factors influencing perinatal outcomes

Ann N Y Acad Sci

2004

;

1038

227

–

three

Hack

Grand

Fanaroff

Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990s

Early Hum Dev

1999

;

193

–

218

Gilbert

Nesbitt

Danielsen

The cost of prematurity: quantification by gestational age and birth weight

Obstet Gynecol

2003

;

102

488

–

five

World Wellness Organisation

International statistics classification of diseases and related health problems.

10th revision, Vol two

Geneva, Switzerland

WHO

1993

half-dozen

Goldenberg

Cliver

Small for gestational age and intrauterine growth brake: definitions and standards

Clin Obstet Gynecol

1997

;

twoscore

704

–

fourteen

Goldenberg

Kirby

Culhane

Stillbirth: a review

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med

2004

;

–

viii

Goldenberg

Koski

Boyd

Cutter

Nelson

Fetal deaths in Alabama 1974 to 1983: a birth weight-specific analysis

Obstet Gynecol

1987

;

831

–

nine

Goldenberg

Rouse

The prevention of premature birth

Northward Engl J Med

1998

;

339

313

–

Martin

Hamilton

Exist

Ventura

Menacker

Park

Births: final data for 2000

Natl Vital Stat Rep

2002

;

–

101

eleven

Ananth

Joseph

Oyelese

Demissie

Vintzileos

Trends in preterm nascence and perinatal mortality amongst singletons: Us, 1989 through 2000

Obstet Gynecol

2005

;

105

1084

–

Blondel

Kaminski

Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births

Semin Perinatol

2002

;

239

–

Kramer

Platt

Yang

, et al.

Secular trends in preterm nascency: a hospital-based accomplice written report

JAMA

1998

;

280

1849

–

Schieve

Handler

Preterm commitment and perinatal death among blackness and white infants in a Chicago-surface area perinatal registry

Obstet Gynecol

1996

;

356

–

fifteen

Goldenberg

Cerebral palsy

. In:

Creasy

Resnik

eds

Maternal-fetal medicine.

fifth ed.

Philadelphia, PA

Saunders

2003

1303

–

Lorenz

Wooliever

Jetton

Paneth

Due north

A quantitative review of mortality and developmental inability in extremely premature newborns

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

1998

;

152

425

–

Goldenberg

Hoffman

Cliver

Neurodevelopmental outcome of pocket-sized-for-gestational-age infants

Eur J Clin Nutr

1998

;

(

suppl

S54

–

Barker

Fetal origins of cardiovascular disease

Ann Med

1999

;

(

suppl

–

half-dozen

Goldenberg

Iams

Mercer

, et al.

The Preterm Prediction Study: the value of new vs standard gamble factors in predicting early and spontaneous preterm nascence

Am J Public Health

1998

;

233

–

Iams

Goldenberg

Meis

, et al.

The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature commitment

N Engl J Med

1996

;

334

567

–

Goldenberg

Goepfert

Ramsey

Biochemical markers for the prediction of preterm birth

Am J Obstet Gynecol

2005

;

192

(

suppl

S36

–

Goldenberg

Hauth

Andrews

Intrauterine infection and preterm commitment

Northward Engl J Med

2000

;

342

1500

–

Romero

Gomez

Chaiworapongsa

Conoscenti

Yard

Kim

The function of infection in preterm labour and delivery

Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol

2001

;

(

suppl

–

Goldenberg

Culhane

Infection as a cause of preterm birth

Clin Perinatol

2003

;

xxx

677

–

700

Wen

Goldenberg

Cutter

Hoffman

Cliver

Intrauterine growth retardation and preterm delivery: prenatal take a chance factors in an indigent population

Am J Obstet Gynecol

1990

;

162

213

–

Hendler

Goldenberg

Mercer

, et al.

The Preterm Prediction Written report: Association between maternal body mass index (BMI) and spontaneous preterm birth

Am J Obstet Gynecol

2005

Mar

;

192

882

–

Cliver

Goldenberg

Cutter

Hoffman

Davis

Nelson

The effect of cigarette smoking on neonatal anthropometric measurements

Obstet Gynecol

1995

;

625

–

Cliver

Goldenberg

Cutter

, et al.

The relationships among psychosocial contour, maternal size, and smoking in predicting fetal growth retardation

Obstet Gynecol

1992

;

lxxx

262

–

seven

Goldenberg

Hauth

DuBard

Copper

Cutter

Fetal growth in women using low dose aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia

J Maternal Fetal Med

1995

;

218

–

Goldenberg

Tamura

Neggers

, et al.

The effect of zinc supplementation on pregnancy result

JAMA

1995

;

274

463

–

Goldenberg

Tamura

Prepregnancy weight and pregnancy outcome

JAMA

1996

;

275

1127

–

eight

(editorial)

Oakley

Folic acid-preventable spina bifida and anencephaly

JAMA

1993

;

269

1292

–

Ceesay

Prentice

Cole

, et al.

Effects on nascence weight and perinatal mortality of maternal dietary supplements in rural Gambia: 5 year randomised controlled trial

BMJ

1997

;

315

786

–

Goldenberg

Rouse

The prevention of premature birth

Northward Engl J Med

1998

;

339

313

–

Kramer

Maternal nutrition and agin pregnancy outcomes: lessons from epidemiology

Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program

2005

;

–

discussion 11–v

Dyson

Danbe

Bamber

, et al.

Monitoring women at gamble for preterm labor

North Engl J Med

1998

;

338

–

Kramer

Determinants of depression nativity weight: methodological cess and meta-analysis

Bull World Wellness Organ

1987

;

663

–

737

Gyetvai

Hannah

Hodnett

Ohlsson

Tocolytics for preterm labor: a systematic review

Obstet Gynecol

1999

;

869

–

Meis

Klebanoff

Thousand

Thom

East

, et al.

for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network

Prevention of recurrent preterm commitment past 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate

N Engl J Med

2003

;

348

2379

–

da Fonseca

Bittar

Carvalho

MHB

Zugaib

Prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study

Am J Obstet Gynecol

2003

;

188

419

–

NIH Consensus Development Console on the Consequence of Corticosteroids for Fetal Maturation on Perinatal Outcomes

Effect of corticosteroids for fetal maturation on perinatal outcomes

JAMA

1995

;

273

413

–

Jobe

Pulmonary surfactant therapy

N Engl J Med

1993

;

328

861

–

viii

FOOTNOTES

Presented at the briefing "Maternal Nutrition and Optimal Infant Feeding Practices," held in Houston, TX, February 23–24, 2006.

smithabling.blogspot.com

Source: https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/85/2/584S/4649824

How Many Babies Are Born Preterm or With a Low Birth Weight in the Us

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

DEFINITIONS OF Depression BIRTH WEIGHT

NEONATAL OUTCOMES ASSOCIATED WITH Low BIRTH WEIGHT

STILLBIRTH AND Low BIRTH WEIGHT

PRETERM Nascence

RACE, ETHNICITY, AND Depression Birth WEIGHT

Low-BIRTH-WEIGHT OUTCOMES

CHRONIC DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH LOW Birth WEIGHT

PREDICTING PRETERM Nascency

INFECTION AND PRETERM Nascency

NUTRITIONAL ISSUES

NUTRITIONAL INTERVENTIONS

STRATEGIES USED TO REDUCE Depression BIRTH WEIGHT

REGIONALIZATION OF PERINATAL CARE

SUMMARY

REFERENCES

FOOTNOTES

0 Response to "How Many Babies Are Born Preterm or With a Low Birth Weight in the Us"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel